[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.7706694 [View]
File: 49 KB, 647x340, 1435186030954.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7706694

>>7706638

>> No.7392401 [View]
File: 42 KB, 647x340, 1435186030954.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7392401

>>7392390
>3:00PM - 4:00PM ET: NASA TV coverage of media briefing and high-resolution images of Pluto.
who /hype/ here

>> No.7352613 [View]
File: 42 KB, 647x340, alright.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7352613

>>7352596
You are misunderstanding their stance. They're stating they don't need evidence to support their knowledge. The null hypothesis may be valid here (after observing data), but that isn't their stance at all. They're claiming they know the outcome of research before the research takes place.

>I don't need a study to tell me this
>I don't need a study to show me there exists no statistical relationship

Actually, that's exactly why you need a study. The null hypothesis can be a stance reasonably taken after conducting a study. Otherwise your "hypothesis" is just an opinion with no underpinnings in science. The null hypothesis literally depends on observed data as it's based in statistics.

>>7352600
>>7352604
I'm not sure if I'm being baited.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]