/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6062833
better questions:
1. Why does the rest of the world have to put up with dumb Americans?
2. Do Americans realise that no one else questions the validity of scientific theories?
3. Do Americans realise that a theory is not a hypothesis?
4. Are Americans so dumb as to not want universal health care like most first-world countries?
5. Why does the rest of the world have to put up with dumb Americans?

>>5511041
Yeah, that way we can wait a fucking extra 100 years in stead of just getting fucking nasa in on the subject.

No physics nerds on /sci/, wat?

lol, honestly forgot howto solve these kind of problems. really, i would appreciate some calculations too..

So guys, whats that theory that if you race past the speed of light and look back on earth its back in time?

>Every kid on /sci/ picking up the mistakes made by world-class physicists
>Mfw

>>3603745
I set the triangle with 40 degree's adjacent side to x, while the other triangle's adjacent side to 50-x.

This problem is just typical trig, sucks that I've taken almost 4 semesters of calc and forgot how to do it along with a lot of people in my class :|

If anyone can help me solve it with correct formulas then thanks, if not I'll go ask about it before class tomorrow

hullo /sci/

you lot are usually relatively clever. do you believe in any conspiracy theories?

the only one I've ever seen that was even vaguely convincing is JFK assassination, and even then, I'm dubious.

the sort of people who believe in conspiracy theories are also the sort of emotionally stunted basement dwellers who feed off their own egotistical desire to know something that everyone else doesn't. it makes them happy to think that they have cracked some secret government plan that the rest of the mindless plebs believe in. I really don't like them.

I'm not atheist but
>adolf hitler
>atheist
nope.avi

>leonardio dicaprio and chuck norris as examples of theists
herpderp

>nothing exists but me.
>mfw you aren't external to the universe, YOU ARE THE UNIVERSE

>>2637642
.9999... is only an approximation for 1/3

math is absolute and perfect. Oh yea and OP, go fuck yourself, you cant divide by zero

For the past three and a half years I've assumed I would go on to grad school in physics. However, now I'm fairly certain I don't have the grades/GRE score to go anywhere decent.

What the hell should I do with my life?

Any C++ fags on tonight?

This is my question: the function substr returns true if its second argument is a substring of its first argument.

True or false. I would like to know which is it (T or F) and why it is.

cout<<pow(2,pow(3,1));

Does this result in 8?

>>2045545
>theoretical math
>pointless in applications

TO THE TOP WE GO

>earwigs different

>>1384222

>>1099220

i know . this stuck out like a sore thumb. i was all like