/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6460641
To make a nuclear weapon from scratch you must first invent the universe.

>>6448631
>Do you blame society for being too "degenerate" because you don't get laid?

nice, epic, I like it

>>6241693

Jacob Barnett

>>6168266

>When you need a vaccine, see if Ayn Rand will help you out.

oh wow

>PhD in shitposting
>Any board I want
>3 day ban starting

Person A has a source W with min-entropy(W) = k. He also has an extra piece of information about the random source, denoted with y, such that min-entropy(W|y) = k/3.

The adversary doesn't know y.

Can person A use a (strong) randomness extractor on the source W, where the extractor requires the min-entropy to be k?

For person A the output would not be close to uniform since the min-entropy given y is actually k/3. However, for the adversary the min-entropy of W is k. So is my reasoning correct that for the adversary the output is still close to uniform (i.e. ϵ-close)?

http://www.amazon.com/Ideas-Geniuses-Germain-Dr-Andrew-Nassif/dp/1482749130
>Andrew Magdy Kamal is a genius with an IQ average of 231.734. Nasir Germain is also gifted with an IQ average of 195. These two physics specialist are awnsering some of the biggest questions the world have ever known.