/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16198410
You can't collapse a quantum wave function unless a consciousness observes it. Thus we must conclude that lacking a conscious observer nothing can exist. It's the "Tree in the Woods" paradox. If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound? The answer is of course, no.

So it is with The Universe. To exist, someone must be here to look at it. I'm just now getting into it by Sir Roger Penrose and others believe the brain and consciousness have quantum systems. These systems generate randomness via uncertainty principle among other things. So the brain is likely hardwired into the quantum world which has huge implications.

>>16198420
>IQ of 07 detected
Cope and seethe more midwit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWlpNm1C5gw

All you chemical rocket cultists need to watch Dr. O'Dowd's newest video. He really spells out how difficult it is to get humans to our nearest star. The distances, times, and ship size all help explain why it can not and will not ever be possible with chemical rockets. He clearly points to the water shield being key to space exploration. You can't launch the water let alone the ship, crew, and misc junk. It would take Starship hundreds if not thousands of launches to build a single interstellar generation ship that had any hopes of success. That's a single ship too! Even if you scale that down for Mars it's only going to be 1/4 the scale at best. Becoming a multi planet species is impossible with ONLY CHEMICAL ROCKETS. Hopefully as Tesla collapses into ass gas you cultists will begin to wake up and do some real work towards space flight in the 21st Century.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWlpNm1C5gw