/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8206506
Right idea, wrong graph.
Try this one.

>>8189493
>1.Intelligence is distributed less evenly in men than in women, i.e. there are more geniuses but also more retards among men.
THIS
Plus, women aren't obligated to do much of anything.
Men are compelled to make their own way in the world, women have the option of coasting along.

>>8161212
>So it seems likely that it’s simply a matter of cultural and genetic programming determining what each of the sexes actually cares about, rather than some form of inherent intellectual disparity.
So it's (in part) genetic, but somehow, there's still no "inherent intellectual disparity."???

>>8042808
>tl;dr its our culture .
Unless, of course it's not.
There very well could be gender-specific trends.
Even if the NBA allowed female players, most would still be male, mostly because of cultural gender roles, but also partially because men are taller, on average , than women.
Plus men tend to vary from their average height more than women do, so unusually tall people are disproportionately male.
This higher standard deviation would also explain why men do so much better in track and field events.
Even if the average woman runs as fast as the average man (for all we know they might run faster), the most exceptional men are more exceptional than the most exceptional women.

>>7925762
>What stops women from being good at math?

>>7707046
>Men just seem more engaged thtas all.
Men also have a greater standard deviation in almost every statistic.
That would mean the most exceptional students are male, both exceptionally good and exceptionally poor.

https://www.google.com/search?q=gender+iq+standard+deviation

You are far less likely to see an extremely intelligent woman than an extremely intelligent man, but they are out there. It is simply the way their intelligence is generally distributed.They have a much higher percentage of "average" individual than males who span a wider intelligence base.

>>6970229
Pretty accurate because this.