[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15294194 [View]
File: 682 KB, 200x200, 200w.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15294194

>>15293687
hot pic, but she's a slut
break her fucking neck
Hedonic Emotivism

So, the first thing you want to know, since I know you're subject to a Gödellian condition, is the esssential novel question, the question on the top of every thinking person's mind, what is the psychological breakdown of the author when confronted with the text? What effect did the writing process have on the final product? To what extent did previous stages of the product affect later stages? Is the entire thing essentially a degenerate criminal scam?

Hedonic emotivism doesn't give a shit. It gets rid of all of that. And for those nerve cases, we have a solution, but it's below, you have to read. Yes, we do the ghost treatment. We do the ghost-nerve fuck you German idealism fuck you Immanuel Kant fuck you Georg Hegel and FUCK YOU GEORG CANTOR FUCK ALL THE GEORG

Fuck George Washington. FUCK THE USA! YOU ARE ALL FUCKING GLOWNIGGERS AND YOU KNOW IT! GODDAMN! I HAVE HAD IT WITH YOU! I AM AT THE "ELEPHANT MUST" OF ORWELL'S FUCKING SHOOTING A FUCKING ELEPHANT, MOTHERFUCKER! There is no elephant. I am not here. I am pure loving kindness & purefucking bliss.

Fuck the Buddhist Priests.

The necromancers are okay. I like the negroes. Don't make this about me. I certainly don't give a fuck about you, so don't make this about you, either, pal. Fuck the niggers. Blacks are okay.

I can make my Macintosh computer talk to me. I often do this, you know, for neural-therapeutic reasons. Fuck them women. I love women. Treat the women well. Love the women. Bliss.

>> No.15230891 [View]
File: 682 KB, 200x200, 200w.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15230891

>>15230879
Good example; great example. You're doing the Lord's work.
Lordy.
Sophistry.
What is it?
Taking both sides. Ignoring your personal feelings. Practicing arguing for *both* sides of an issue. Really making sure you can do it, convincingly, acting like you really mean it. Arguing in bad faith. Acting like you mean it when you don't. Making others think you mean it.
That's sophistry, m8
For example: acting stupid.
A very good way to practice sophistry. What if I were stupid? Instead of gettin' emotionally involved with bein' smart, just be stupid.
Like, dig?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]