[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.12602674 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12602674

>>12602417

>> No.12125043 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, go educate yourself.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12125043

>>12124190
>9-16-2020
>Scientific American Announces it's Support for Debunking Genetics and Replacing it With Gender Science
>"Like Alchemy to Chemistry, Astronomy to Astrology, and Classical Mechanics to Quantum Theory before it, we must embrace the new paradigm no matter how unlike it is to the predecessor!"

>> No.11302215 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11302215

>>11302189
It's technoscience so it belongs on >>>/g/

>> No.11060299 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11060299

>>11060119
>>>/lgbt/

>> No.10753379 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10753379

>>10751544

>> No.10436260 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10436260

>>10436246
>its a science
What about political science or feminist technoscience?

>> No.10154820 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10154820

>>10154488

>> No.10128091 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10128091

>>10122297

>> No.10123597 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10123597

>>10123564

>> No.10095809 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10095809

>>10095660
Feminist technoscience isn't real science and you're all mentally ill.

>> No.9795731 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9795731

>>9795717
Only if it's Feminist technoscience

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_technoscience

>> No.9758913 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9758913

>>9758909

>> No.9688034 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9688034

>>9688004

>> No.9686704 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9686704

>>9686469
>Japanese 101
>Japanese 102
>Japanese 201
>Japanese 202
>Japanese 301
>Japanese 302
>Japanese 401
>Japanese 402
And not an ounce of Cultural Marxism in sight.

You only have yourself to blame if you take Feminist Technoscience 206 thinking it's going to be about sexbots and Sheeeit only to get repeatedly shamed for being born with a penis and have to write 100 page apologies to all the women you have micro-raped.

>> No.9650143 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9650143

>>9648698
They refuse to recognize feminist technoscience as a valid field.

>> No.9555012 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9555012

>>9553385
Easiest: Feminist Technoscience
2nd easiest Computer Science
3rd easiest: Political Science
4th: Biology
5th: Geology

>> No.9517942 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9517942

>>9517913
They mean science∩math so no biological "science", political "science", feminist techno"science", or computer "science"

>> No.9406855 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9406855

>>9406853
Feminist Technoscience

>> No.9383250 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9383250

>>9383176
80% of interdisciplinary work is a field + feminism/women studies/sociology in which it is argued that the field is sexist/racists/*phobic/evil and should be banned or radically changed for social justice sake.

19% of interdisciplinary work is a field + cs in which the work you did was primarily code monkey/data monkey stuff that didn't require deep understanding of the problem domain.

1% of interdisciplinary work is actually good like mathematical physics.

>> No.9135743 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9135743

>>9134999
Where's the racism?

>> No.9000413 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9000413

>>8997956

>> No.8895833 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8895833

>>8895813

But what about feminist technoscience?

>> No.8664027 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8664027

>>8663965

It's Sociology/Women's Studies

>> No.8620463 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1089x1795, 1449477541479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8620463

>>8617988
It's technoscience

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]