/sci/ - Science & Math

Can anyone confirm?

Newfag here. Hope this question is okay here. This pic was posted on /b/ a few days ago in a fact dump thread. Are the conclusions scientifically accurate or is it just another /pol/ troll image?

Men have always done most of the hunting, fighting, building, etc. indeed, the sexual division of labor became even greater as humans became more civilized, up to a certain point. So men were always pressured to be smarter and stronger. Women pretty much just get fucked and be pregnant, and do more tedious, less demanding things like cooking and gathering (as indicated by the fact that women on average have much lower physical strength and stamina than men).

The obvious result is that men are adapted to be useful, while women are not. I've also noted that women don't even have as much passion or enthusiasm or ambition for doing challenging/impressive/creative things as men. This makes sense, since taking care of kids/snapping beans all day favors a certain lack of desire to do more interesting things.

The only hope for women is to take hormones so they have a more male-like hormonal profile in terms of testosterone, cortisol, and thyroid hormone.

Also, all you faggots bringing up token female scientists are only proving OP's point.

Does the number of neurons really affect your intelligence?

>>6801955