/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15791627
Looking up the actual dress. You're objectively wrong about it.
But absent that, sure, we can either assume context, which is what gave rise to the controversy due to its ambiguity, or we can point out the actual colours of the pixels of the photograph, which is entirely uninteresting. But don't pretend to be objective when you're saying things like "that shade of blue looks white to me". Objectively (insofar as colours can be objectively called), it is a light shade of blue in the photograph. When you call that white, you are in fact assuming the context.