/sci/ - Science & Math

>dick so high i cant see where im walking

>>12709651
>Peak bug mentality Tbh
a substanceless post of a totally meaningless grammatical structure signifying you have 4chan-induced brain rot. nice. if you're older than 13 and you haven't figured that you literally cannot keep asking "why?" forever by pure physical necessity then you are "peak" npc. moreover, all logical structures are contingent upon axioms which necessarily cannot be broken down further, by definition. by using language to express and build ideas, you are stuck in the world of logic which is always going to be contingent upon some set of immutable (and likely, incomplete) axioms. you are never going to reach the bottom, and it is sad that there are still people that cannot just face the most obvious and basic facts.

>>12709689
>The only time to stop asking is at the creator of the universe
the creator of the universe either is or is "outside" the universe. in any case, what is true of the parts does not need to be true of the whole (fallacy of composition). there is no way to know from our stance whether or not reaching the creator is even possible, and there is no reason to think that it is, if such a being exists. you literally cannot keep asking "why?" forever. this is a built-in feature of the universe. maybe you'll wake up someday

>>12104920
How brain-dead are you? This is an extremely stupid post. I responded to >>12104655 and then this guy >>12104684
and this guy >>12104716 both responded to me and all I've done is replied to them. Do you hire someone to wipe your drool for you too?

>>11599823
>It's another OP asks a question and gets shown why he's a fucking retard asking a "useless forum" useless questions then gets angry and lashes out at everyone else
If I had a dime for every dumbfuck like you that comes here. Also read the sticky retard.

>>11492988
>Literally take your medication and stop Reddit spacing.
You're accusing me of being someone I'm not, and then telling ME to take my medication?

>It's cute you keep reusing my insults and then crying projection.
That's what projection IS, retard. When I say you're projecting by calling me pathetic, I am necessarily "reusing your insult".

>At no point did I imply that
Of course you did. You could be Montano for all I know; taking the moral highground like this puts a burden on everybody here.

>For someone who is 'totally not the person who did that', you sure seem quick to defend it.
I know I'm not him, so I'm not sure what you're trying to prove here. You're just coming across as mentally unstable now.

>4chan isn't a single person, retard.
I didn't even think I was arguing with you on this point, in fact I thought we were in agreement. It isn't a single person, sure, obviously, but anonymity (again) means I could be talking to Montano right now.
>fictitious girl
She was real
>would never wish him harm
I mean these are arguably the people that did him harm, by buying him a drumset, which notoriously got him kicked out of his parents house. Wishing him harm is mutually exclusive to actually doing him harm.

>seeking attention, contrarian, narcissist, hot takes, cringe, cock sucker
None of these are arguments and every insult is only proving me right, lmfao. Thanks though

>>11480125
>It's just another flu.
How much are they paying you? Do you have any internal monologue? How many people in the past week on this website have called you a retard? Have you been able to figure out why in spite of your obvious illiteracy and cripplingly low iq?

>>11477752
>links a twitter post
this is a high iq thread right here

>>11477935
>Only 0.0019% of the world population has the Wuhan Plague. It is not nearly as contagious as the news hypes it up to be. Going into "quarantine" over this is stupid. Just go outside, you'll be fine.
holy fuck you're stupid

>VOTE WITH YOUR DOLLAR

>>11279553
Those are side effects and none of them have been shown to be permanent. On the contrary.

>>11279635
Did you read any of those studies anon? Like even one of them? Or my comment? Let's go through them together...

Again, here's my claim:
>Only happens temporarily
>In *like* 1% of men
>men
>not a single study shows permanent side effects
>side effects go away after roughly half a decade

>https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/8/8/EC-19-0199.xml
Neat. Nothing here contradicts anything I claimed.

>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960076017301024
Wow, "persistent side effects MAY occur"? You really proved me wrong anon!

>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306453018305067
PFS again. One month after withdrawal. Mice studies. Boring. Irrelevant.

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479083/
>Mice study
Anon you aren't this dumb are you?

>etc
Oh, there's more? I'd love to see them and I hope they're better than the ones you just linked here. Because all you've done is proven my point.

>>10789119
>>10789109
no