[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11204773 [View]
File: 113 KB, 237x249, amanda2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11204773

Lol.

>> No.11203217 [View]
File: 113 KB, 237x249, amanda2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11203217

>>11203192
>The Earth is round
I agree.
>The Moon landings happened and space travel is real.
I agree.
>Newtonian Mechanics is an accurate and incomplete description of reality.
An approximation actually, Newton's Gravity equation has been proven to fail under certain circumstances.
>Quantum Mechanics is an accurate and incomplete description of reality
Quantum Mechanics is a model that is an approximation built based on reality, you don't know what accurate means OP.
>Special and General Reactivity are accurate
Approximate.
>The Standard Model is accurate
Approximate.
>The Lambda-CDM model
Never heard of it.
>Faster-than-light communication is impossible.
False.
>Perpetuum mobiles, bluh bluh bluh
Never heard of it.
>Zero-point energy
Never heard of it.
>Thermodynamics is absolute
Maybe I don't know much about the details of it.
>Climate change is real and mostly caused by humans
Mostly caused by science specifically actually!
>Approved vaccines are effective and safer than the diseases they prevent.
I agree.
>"I don't understand this" is not a good criticism
I definitely agree, people use that argument all the time against my French Celestial girlfriend.
>Anyone claiming to have an alternative theory to established science should be able to explain and prove it.
Sure, but what do you think about supplementary theories that don't conflict with approved science?

Don't just make up your own definitions of accurate and incomplete. Accurate means exact, and incomplete means not finished, those are the traditional definitions and if you were smart you would have defined your terms first instead of after I just read all that...

Overall I don't really disagree with any of the things I understood from your post, and the things I don't understand I can't make a statement on because I don't know what your claim is.

>> No.11200049 [View]
File: 113 KB, 237x249, amanda2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11200049

>>11200041
What if, several months from now, you just turn around in a dark room alone to see this woman staring at you, and she said "Why didn't you believe in me?"

how would you react?

>> No.11200015 [View]
File: 113 KB, 237x249, amanda2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11200015

>>11200001
Oh yea? Watch!!!
>>11200000
THAT'S how it's DONE!!!

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]