/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7950144
>image does not say anything
of course not, it's the text that does

>>7480162
Here

>>7051255

Oh boy, continuous verbal abuse and ad hominem. People tend to act this way when their religious beliefs are threatened.

BTW, show me significant temperature data "corrections" that made the rate of warming smaller.

You can't. Pic related.

>>6577172

I didn't write that email. Hadley Climate Research Unit "Scientists" wrote it. Your resort to ad hominem "you're a conspiracy nut!!!" is a pathetic form of denial. The email is right there in front of your eyes.

Look at this blink comparator GIF comparing NASA GISS 1999 temps to 2008 temps.

>>6471652

And look at this. A gif comparing NASA GISS 1999 temps to NASA GISS 2008 temps. Boy, the cooling really disappeared, didn't it?

>>6427026

And here is a gif depicting and comparing two temperature graphs from NASA GISS, 1999 and 2008. I suppose you would refer to them as conspiracy loons.

>>6360589

>corrections to inaccuracies in temperature data, making the whole thing suspect

Why the ad hoc excuse without justification or evidence? Look at this GIF of two temperature graphs from NASA GISS. Why the significant change?

I'm sorry that actual evidence challenges your faith in the Gospel of Gaia.