/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9660737
Also if we could trace over the right half of this image to turn it into an SVG, it would go on the front page too.

>>9636155
>>9636518
I think as long as we use whatever the current best practice distance metric is, then we should be fine. More advanced metrics would probably just let you find more similarity that a simpler metric like Hamming distance would miss.

Also we will want to try this on prominin too >>9630365 >>9630896 >>9631251.

>>9637211
Thanks anon!

>>9637282
That looks really good! Also like I mentioned in the slack, maybe we could consider tracing over some of the graphics from scientific publications in an SVG editor, and then using those so that we can have informative graphics on the website. If we trace it then we should be able to claim fair use. Pic related is one example, but we could also trace images of photoreceptor immunostaining and micrographs.

>>9637308
I think we should probably use whatever is most popular, but my personal opinion is radial rainbow iris > photorealistic iris > concentric iris.

>>9637407
Yep! And thanks!

>>9637695
Maybe we should try plugging some search terms into google scholar and see what other people are using.

>>9636155
>>9636518
I think as long as we use whatever the current best practice distance metric is, then we should be fine. More advanced metrics would probably just let you find more similarity that a simpler metric like Hamming distance would miss.

Also we will want to try this on prominin too >>9630365 >>9630896 >>9631251.

>>9637211
Thanks anon!

>>9637282
That looks really good! Also like I mentioned in the slack, maybe we could consider tracing over some of the graphics from scientific publications in an SVG editor, and then using then using those so that we can have informative graphics on the website. If we trace it then we should be able to claim fair use. Pic related is one example, but we could also trace images of photoreceptor immunostaining and micrographs.

>>9637308
I think we should probably use whatever is most popular, but my personal opinion is radial rainbow iris > photorealistic iris > concentric iris.

>>9637407
Yep! And thanks!

>>9637695
Maybe we should try plugging some search terms into google scholar and see what other people are using.