/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15580262
What is time, ma'am?

>>15406142
No, its space, the one you cant measure with 3D tools.

Space-Time. Not just "Time".

>>15383052
They talk about me...but never the STEM.

NOTICE THIS, /SCI/, THIS IS WHY THE BOARD IS SHIT.

FAKERS THAT YOU IGNORE BECAUSE THEY SOUND JUST LIKE YOU.

>>15325086
Decoupled Spacetime GO!

>>15319577
>natural philosophy
>political philosophy
Sir, this is a Pysics drive-thru.

>>15315901
Im more of a Gravity and Spacetime Physicist.

You?

>>15315373
>not everybody here is to learn except fresh men like you
I am here to learn.
...well...and to teach old farts that they didnt spend learn as hard and fast they thought they did.

Put'em up, old man...

>>15312838
>math PhD
Good luck.

>>15309805
>We
FAIL.

I said "YOUR". We didnt even get to the test...you FAILED at putting YOUR name on it! Good Lord, WTF?!?

>>15263119
>Imagine a pencil.
I stopped reading here...*sigh*...

>>15263064
Yes.

>>15239610
>I've just (re)discovered the fundamental nature of gravity.
Then you would have posted something different...something waaay more schizo.

You're not insane. I am insane.

>>15070785
>ITS CALLED SPACE TIME.
Was. I call it Spaced-Time™.

>>15068626
>"is he referring to the fact that electromagnetism is a U(1) gauge theory and U(1) is a 1d lie group?"
Ah, well yeah, I am. I "invented" Gauge theory on my own to solve equations but didnt know it had a name or "was a thing". Langragian/Guage theory heavy theories.

My words do in fact differ from what is regularly used. So, yeah, that is an general issue.

>"from north tl south"
Magnetohydrodynamics. Do they not flow? Do these shards no infer directionality?

>what's the big deal with the Klein bottle?

I use a Klein bottle as a hyperball (the 2D sphere with no measures on the inside). A sort of mpbius strib of phere shaping.

I used that geometry to measure spacetime and counterspaced/inversted space as gravity, and by proxy a fundemental metric of time measure outside of "relative change".

I jumped the gun a bit...but Im still king shit (smug-faced-asshole.jpeg).

>>15066057
>Time = duration, space = distance, abstract measurements only, without physical existence
...and Im working on this very problem. (Not at *this* very moment, Im on vacation in Netherlands fot Christmas :333)

Time as a dynamic force proportional to matter, which is proportional to gravity. It helped me calculate my equations as 4 spacial dimensions, not 3.

Having said that my work shines brighter than anyone else's in the world when sub-3D, which requires a retooling of spacetime and things like enertia/motion/velocity etc.

>>15062478
>(material, 4 spatially dimensional) tesseract
Gravity is inverted matter, an "inside-out" dimension, or "counter-space".

>>15059437
>instead of gravity causing them to crash into one another as one might expect.

I attributed this to Magnetism being a yet unified for to Gravity. In my theory Magnetism is partial space/time. Physicist connected the two, I divided them with both portions Still contain space & time.

Also explains why Galaxies orbit itself in unison, and not dynamically (fastest in the middle, slower outside) as the are connected through a magnetism and hold each other in place, like a superconducting magnet.

>>14978263

>Great in that Latin sense is closer to ths term Magic than Measure...as is Magic Short Sword or Greater Short Sword
>Because the MAGNETIC part was MAGIC

Youre no Linguist...not one bit.

Also, everything about Physics you know is WRONG.

ALL OF IT.

>>14972465
*some