/sci/ - Science & Math

>Why the hell is everyone on /sci/.

Formatting their replies like this.

>And seemingly unaware that the words they use.

Have meaning both in and of themselves.

>As well as drastic variation in compound meaning when put together.

Both of which they readily ignore.

>Spewing tons of information irrelevant to the argument in question.

And getting lost in the realm of the absurd by splitting doubly-redundant hairs.

>As well as assuming the other party is arguing from a position that they have not even implied.

And would be just as irrelevant to the argument at hand either way.

>It's as if language itself goes above their heads.

And their only criterion for typing any given word as opposed to any one of the rest of the words they know.

>Is something of a primitive aesthetic judgement.

Never going beyond their memory of troglodyte 1:1 association of what to them are just empty sound clusters.

>That they previously heard in vague proximity to other sound clusters they observed others receiving positive attention for.

IS THIS A GLIMPSE OF PURGATORY?