/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8544285
Steal eugenics.

>Oh, do you put your own feelings above all else? Right this way, let us cut off your genitals.

>>8500860
>dark matter is literal meme
>meme drive actually works
Have physicits ever been so BTFO in a single year?

>OP doesn't know LaTeX

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEV5AFFcZ-s

Tori are the new mangnets. ＩＴ’Ｓ ＦＵＣＫＩＮ’ ＭＡＧＩＣ！ Ｉ ＡＩＮ’Ｔ ＧＯＴＴＡ ＥＸＰＬＡＩＮ ＳＨＩＴ！

>>3807619

>mfw retard inbred cars

>>3470358

"we all know it's either to be banged by some croissant scoffing surrender bot or to make some shitty travel blog"

>this thread proves evolution by going from butthurt to trolling

>>2681900
>No numeric values are given for any of the variables.

>>2600295
> intergalactic travel
> at light speed
> mfw

In all seriousness, you'd have to be doing like 100000% speed of light to get there in any humanly amount of time

>>2597352

Of course units of "Utils" do not exist. No one made the argument they do, only yourself, you straw manning machine. Marginal Utility and Subjective Theory of Value do not predict the existence of "Utils" or any form of objective measurement of subjective value/utility in any way, saying they do is like saying Evolution predicts monkeys giving birth to humans.

And jesus christ, never proved? Not empirically observable? Do you even know the most basic thing about Marginal Utility? Have you ever studied how people behave when exchanging, or why they exchange? Have you ever even read a Microecon textbook or Menger's "Principles of Economics"?

It's a fucking big, complex theory, that can be seen EVERYDAY. You can empirically observe the Law of Decreasing Marginal Utility everyday in several different situations, just by examining day-to-day occurrences you can see that value is Subjective. MUT is just like fucking Evolution.

And what do you propose instead of MUT? The fucking Labour-Theory of Value? Answer me, where does "Value" come from, and then try to prove it empirically.

The MUT doesn't even have anything to do with money. It's about why people value things and why people exchange things. It's about economics decisions, NOT money-decisions.

You are just like Creationists who, not understanding the theory and not knowing it's predictions and implications, assume there are none. GTFO of /sci/ forever.

yfw you realize all matter is composed of energy and fields and that nothing has any absolute volume or is "solid" using the classical definition of the word.