/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15312645
The fastest way from A to B would be to ram the sun with a needle and suck out the juices, collect the energy in a vacuum, crash said vacuum into an energy well, then assimilate it with a main vehicle or keep it floating stagnantly for later use.

>>12434437
new planet or moon on the way! neat.

>>12156333
>fake
If you cared at all about this, you could very easily reproduce this yourself. It would take 5 minutes of your time.
Here's the original gif
>go to ezgif website or use your own software
>invert color and shift the hue a bit

Or if you prefer.
>go to https://helioviewer.org/
>punch in time stamp
>make gif
>edit color for clarity of detail

>>12141127
clearly here you can see the sun ejecting a spherical waveform: a quantum. literally that's all quantum means: individual entities with a boundary: indivisible.

Explain

Can someone explain wtf I'm looking at
pic related, link to video also

https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/assets/img/dailymov/2012/03/11/20120311_1024_0171.ogv

>>10001233
it's another one of these

hello /sci/

what is this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQ7RaOMHb5I

its not aliums is it

Which answer provides the most logical conclusion in numerical terms (ex: distance and time) and relies as little as possible on speculation of what alien life might do (ex: transcending biological form to live or hibernate in some type of simulated realm)

Hello nerds.

Please explain.

What is this?

>>8732999
What would that achieve? Any communications from it would be drowned out long before it even got close.

It'd be more interesting to send one grazing through the corona, robotically collecting neat data, and then relaying to us after passing through perigee and rising away from the Sun again.

so what this means is that all of the matter that has fallen into the black hole before you, is ahead of you, still falling. from your perspective, the matter ahead of you is all continuously slowing down, contracting, and red-shifting such that it endlessly approaches but never meets the event horizon while appearing to flatten out completely and fade to black.

since there are no reference frames outside the event horizon that allow for matter to approach the horizon in finite time, it's extremely questionable whether matter can even cross it. if the horizon did in fact have its own reference frame, it would be such that all incoming matter crosses it together, at a point in the 'infinite future' relative to the outside. who knows what that would even mean; the only thing that's clear is that an event horizon and what lies beyond somehow transcend space and time.

the dominant, singularity-based view of black holes just doesn't seem plausible when you consider the physics of an event horizon as predicted by the theories of relativity. time-dilation just never allows matter to cross that boundary, only to accumulate around it in a state of endless collapse. when a black hole grows, it's like a bubble, with all new matter collecting along an expanding 2D surface.

the model that seems to best explain the behavior of an event horizon is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetospheric_eternally_collapsing_object which states that 'black holes' are objects in eternal collapse, where no matter has ever crossed the horizon, and therefore have properties that a 'true' black hole couldn't, such as a magnetic field.

what does /sci/ think of a non-singularity black hole model? i've yet to hear a convincing argument that anything at or beyond an event horizon can even exist, but maybe i just haven't heard the right argument yet.

TL;DR what the fuck does any of this mean

>>7376669
Orbiting its way around the galaxy i guess

You have 10 seconds to explain what this is, /sci/?