[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15706980 [View]
File: 115 KB, 652x384, 1693427107002.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15706980

>>15706978

>> No.15627953 [View]
File: 115 KB, 652x384, 1687563774969500.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15627953

>>15627382
So the considered unbiased methodology of intelligence quotient tests are the ones that are based on pattern recognition. There is a correlation between better pattern recognition, however there are other forms of intelligence. Logic, short term memory, long term memory, muscle memory, body limbs coordination, computation, verbal cues, mental object rotation, and facial cues. You can have someone with great short term and long term memory but if he cannot reason properly then certain fields are not suitable. Most medical doctors and nurses fall into the category of good memory. However, those fields rarely reward those with good logic and reasoning. Most doctors will memorize jargon and the functions of man's body. Most will not be able to even grasp recursion let alone be able to come up with the logic necessary for recursion. Now you might think I am being harsh on the medical field, but honestly I am not. Most medical doctors and nurses just input your problem into a computer and the computer will bring up possible medical conditions and treatments. This is why medical malpractice is killing so many people. The medical school is too focused on memorization and not reasoning.

I am sure some of you medical doctors here are going to take offense to this post, but I may not be talking about you, but you know the people I am talking about. And you know that they are the reason so much medical malpractice permeates the system. They were only good at memorizing verbatim. Any deviation does not compute.

>> No.15469855 [View]
File: 115 KB, 652x384, 1685331047667567.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15469855

What does /sci/ think about Freud's penis envy theory? Is it true or not? I tried to look up recent research, but it doesn't seem like there is much. Wikipedia doesn't even have a single reference from this century. Has the topic become taboo?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]