/sci/ - Science & Math

Reminder that anyone favouring anything else but Copenhagen is either a senile fuck throwing a temper tantrum (hello Weinberg) or irrelevant watermelonium-tier organism that lacks higher cerebral function.

>>9953636
Thanks, keep up the good vibes.
>>9953641
Obviously wrong.

Why is it a trend to use QM in some pseud babbles? It doesn't give you any credibility, please stop raping QM.

Copenhagen

>>9896167
What makes me think this is true is the progress we've made so far as humanity. There once was a consensus that the sun orbits the earth even though there was evidence for the contrary.
If your theory yields models that all fail unless you rape statistics so that your ensemble somewhat agrees with carefully picked evidence, you fuck right off and find a new theory to test. Alarmists or deniers, both utterly failed so far - it doesn't matter in the slightest who is a bigger failure. Climate science is the only field where you see people desperately clinging to their favourite theory despite its obvious failures. It's a cult, not a science, on both sides.

so why is every autist riding on his hindu cock?