/sci/ - Science & Math

I have no idea what it means. I’m pretty sure nobody has any idea what it means. And it’s the most profound thing that I have ever seen in my life.

make it make sense

What does it mean?

Hello, idiots-

I’m looking for some explanation of the significance of the Poincaré conjecture, namely what Perelman’s proof of it implies. In particular, I want to know if his proof implies that the universe is the surface of a 3 sphere.

What does it mean?

beautiful formula

>>15113206
>itt: brainlets can't into
kys dumb niggers

What does it mean?

What does it mean?

We have the "lead deficiency" anon (have you taken the 12.7mm pills yet bro?)
We have the consciousness philfags who somehow think that falls under science.
The usual AI fags.
We have the mathlets who always complain about cantor but never bother to read about non-standard analysis.
Also the friendly anons who dump math pdfs (thanks guys). And the rudin fags (they never learned anything else).
We also have the "angular momentum isn't conserved" lunatic.
What am I? The prick who loves to hate on the dumbest takes here?
Who are you anon?
Describe your /sci/ character.
What are the scientific implications of all this?

go ahead, say something nice about it

Would Euler's identity be the same in base 12? What about base 2?

>>12605804
I swear to God. Euler fags like pic rel are the lowest tier of humanity

guys if
(1+1/(-1/12))^(-1/12) = e
then what does i =?

Fucking how

>>11272463
>theres basically 4 important numbers which everything is derived from: 1, -1, e and pi. all maths is combining these in different ways
Very wrong, some misconcept from euler identity.

IRC link? love to talk to nerds just like me

I was just curious as to what /sci/ thought of my theory and if they wanted to personally experiment with my cheat code

" Euler's identity is often cited as an example of deep mathematical beauty. The identity also links five fundamental mathematical constants. "


>The number 0.


Not a number. Could be considered a representation of infinity.


>The number 1.

A number but there are arguments it dosent have to be one.


>The number π (π = 3.141...).


Pi is not a number. But could be thought as a representation of infinity.


>The number e (e = 2.718...)


Again, "e" is not a number. Could be a representation of infinity.


>The number i.


'i' is not a number. Could be seen as a representation of infinity.


All this equation is saying is that infinity to the power of infinity plus infinity equals infinity. Fuck this brainlet shit.

" Euler's identity is often cited as an example of deep mathematical beauty. The identity also links five fundamental mathematical constants. "

>The number 0.

Not a number. Could be considered a representation of infinity.

>The number 1.

A number but there are arguments it dosent have to be one.

>The number π (π = 3.141...).

Pi is not a number. But could be thought as a representation of infinity.

>The number e (e = 2.718...)

Again, "e" is not a number. Could be a representation of infinity.

>The number i.

'i' is not a number. Could be seen as a representation of infinity.

All this equation is saying is that infinity to the power of infinity plus infinity equals infinity.

Fuck this brainlet shit.

To me, Euler's identity is just so aesthetically pleasing, all while remaining one of the most important mathematical discoveries.