/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15226791
>what it is
>what it is made from
>how far it is
"You know nuffing" is not an argument. Again, if you'd like to make the specific case against the evidence that quasars are cosmologically different go ahread. But this whining carries no substance.
All is made up meme claims to get the funding rolling and get "meme Star wars fanbois" to spend money on infantilized space fantasies.
>>15226719 (You) #
>1 arcsecond is about the blurring caused by the Earths atmosphere in a good site. This the the limiting quality on images without going to space or using AO

>>a arc second is incredibly small angle.
>You are getting it.
Lol. One post ago you were sure it was 3 degrees. 10,000 times worse that 1 arcsec.
>Farting next to measuring tool which should "measure" via paralax, would cause an different result.
If that was true it would be impossible to get images as sharp as 1 arcsecond. So false. Pic related is a star moving by 10 arsconds, it's very fucking obvious even by eye. Measuring it properly can do many times better.
You are getting it.
>You finally understand that we have no means to accuratly measure some shit like that via triangulation in the sub degree spectrum, because the error rate would be to high.
So you cannot see this star move then?