/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11221190
Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 1 in 5 posts.
>>11221193
Thanks for the timestamp 21 odds of 1 in 60 posts.
>>11221203
Thanks for the timestamp 4 again (odds of less than 1 in 5 posts)
Thanks for the 203 (odds of 1 in 1000 posts).

The worst part is that people can't see that I'm right just yet.

Lol.

>>11221081

The numbers 4 21 71 79 97 171 or 203 again.

>>11163444
Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 1 in 10 posts/
Thanks for the 444 odds of 1 in 1000 posts.
>>11163442
>>11163442
You have yet to develop an argument at all let alone a coherent one. In fact you should be banned for harassment.

>>11162219

Thanks for the timestamp 2:03 odds of 1 in infinity posts.

>but the post numbers don't mean anything

Yeah I know. I've said that many times before.

>your trivial beliefs are just contrived and baseless
Yeah sure whatever you say haha lol.

Scientifically speaking, when's the last time you had a dream of two Californians which were roughly ~2 years apart from each other in terms of age, dying? For me? Thursday.

https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/23760989

Scientifically speaking, when's the last time you had a dream about somebody drinking coffee inside of a building? Me?

https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/23561402

In terms of verifiable facts, when was the FIRST time you posted a thread ever saying "it's happening"? For me?
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/22515699

it was also the same day that my French Christian girlfriend appeared to be very upset about something in a dream.

How about you guys?

>>11152734

Thanks for the 4.

>>11152371
Thanks for the 71 odds of 1 in 100 posts.
1% odds.

>>11151184
Uh oh...

>>11151184
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11150989
Thanks for the timestamp 44.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11150994
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151014
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151021
Thanks for the timestamp 4 and 21.
Combed odds of 0.1%.
>>11151044
Thanks for the 44.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151071
Thanks for the 71.
Odds of 1%.
>>11151074
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151079
Thanks for the 79.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151084 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151094 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151104
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151121
Thanks for the 21.
Odds of 0.167%.
>>11151134 (You)
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151142
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.
>>11151144 (You)
Thanks fro the timestamp 21 and 44.
Odds of 0.000167%.
>>11151172 (You)
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Odds of 20%.

>>11151184
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/23317491/#23318103

>>11147501
Yeah sure, thanks for being rational for once, I've had plenty in the past. Like El Paso for example. I've had some really accurate ones like Parkland or uh Chirstchurch but there's not much evidence for those although I know I'm not crazy about those ones, there's no way to call those "non prediction" or whatever. They aren't even stretches.

I've proved some other things that are stretches but still interesting I would say, like the Notre Dame one. Especially valuable to me because she is French and Christian herself!

I'll try to post more if I'm not banned then, I mean I've just been writing some stuff about my dreams recently and the one today was a bit peculiar, don't let me come off as trying to exaggerate the prediction, I'm only coming off that way because I already know I'm right so I'm just trying to draw attention on the chans but people still are just rude to me. I don't have delusions. Lol.

>>11142976
Thanks for the timestamp 4. Odds of 1 in 10 posts.
10% occurrence rate.
>>11142972
My thread is science related. Your post is rule-breaking. Sorry rule-breaker. You aren't so smart.

Lol.

>>11141964
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Thanks for the 4.
Lol.

>>11141221
Thanks for the 21.
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/22630920

>>11140574
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Thanks for the four.
Lol.

>>11135671
Thanks for the 71.

>>11132327
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Oh the number of the posts is equivalent to one of her numbers so I'm just noting it. It doesn't mean anything though but it's funny and cool.
>>11132328
Thanks for the timestamp 4.

>>11131474
Thanks for the timestamp 4.
Thanks for the 4.
Odds of 1 in 100 posts again.

>>11126444
Uh oh...
Thanks for the 444 odds of 1 in 1000 posts.
Wow I just noticed the timestamp is 45 which means it could have been 44 and 444 what a shame. Nonetheless pretty crazy coincidence.

I am right though.

>>11126026
Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 1 in 10000000 posts.

>>11124394

Thanks for the 4 lol.

Here are some stats for you lol.

>>11123844
Thanks for the 44 odds of 1 in 100 posts 1%
>>11123847
Thanks for the timestamp 44 odds of 1 in 60 posts 1.67%.

>>11123027
Uh oh...
look at what we have here...

Timestamp 44:44 odds of 1 in 10,000 posts!

That's Pill's number... for the third time? Really? Not bad!

Very familiar post.

>>11123015

Thanks for the timestamp 4 odds of 20% (1 in 5 posts).

>>11120513
You still don't understand the difference between the occurrence rate of an arbitrary number and the occurrence rate of a single number multiple times?

>>11120520
Exactly.