/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9751900
>I don't need familiarize myself with differing ideas, I'm inherently right because I'm me!
Oh, no, anon, please stop crushing me under the leaden weight of your mighty arguments.

>>9655834
Also, others being wrong doesn't somehow makes it okay for you to be.

All those feed the starving charities are actually just making things worse, but it's all right, innit, because they get to feel better about themselves, and that's what REALLY matters, not helping the poor and unfortunate.

>>6316412

Psh....

Faggot.

>>5743877
There you go.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders

That is the way psychiatrist diagnose, and there is not scientifically evidence for that, because if they use science, they would have a type of law that would serve his purpose to diagnose correctly most of the people proving them that they indeed have that disorder, but it doesnt.

Like i said, i know that psychiatry is not a pseudoscience, is a applied science that works, but what im saying is, that when it uses psychology as his basis to diagnose people, it looks like a pseudoscience.

So, if you have a lot of journals and books lying around or studies.

Show me please, with scientifically and empirical evidence, how do they diagnose properly this mental disorders, withouth getting wrong 60% of the time.

And please exclude the physical related mental disorders, that are schizophrenia,autism,bipolar disorder,dementia,parkison,alheizmer,huntington,etc.


Prove me wrong.

>>5486457
>rockets
>slow and gentle
>rotate
Too obvious

>>5403079
There are plenty warm white leds of different types in singles on that site.
Different lenses and temperatures and everything.
Come on, man. Atleast try.

>>5078629
>>5078501