/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16172487
they're in it for the money.
they'll stop when there's no money in it.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IaEgcRgE__M

GROSS ERRORS IN THE IPCC-AR4 REPORT REGARDING PAST & FUTURE CHANGES IN GLOBAL TROPICAL CYCLONE ACTIVITY

https://tropical.atmos.colostate.edu/Includes/Documents/Publications/gray2011.pdf

>ABSTRACT
>The United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report Four (AR-4) of 2007, concerning the influence of rising levels of CO2 on global increases of tropical cyclone (TC) activity is inaccurate and a disgrace to the scientific community. The public expected there would be rigor and objectivity coming out of such an important document which shared a Nobel Peace Prize with former US Vice President Al Gore. The summary of TC activity of this report was based on discredited peer-reviewed papers whose lack of authenticity was known before the report was released. A select cadre of global warming advocates (with little TC knowledge or experience) bent their objectivity to drive this report toward a desired (but faulty) conclusion that global TC activity was increasing in frequency and intensity. They further implied that a large portion of this alleged TC increase could likely be attributed to rising levels of CO