/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11207396
Because then you wouldn't be a man in an octopus suit but an octopus in an octopus suit.
These would be Exhumans, not humans.

>>8424674
You got a little more brain devoted to face over hands for motor and sensory. Thats not even including entire back third of brain for eyes, huge amount for smell, taste, hearing. Humans have very well innervated faces compared to monkeys etc cause we speak so much and so complexely

Is neuroscience respectable, or is it just psychology in a fancy dress?

>>7601690
area of the brain that controls sexual behavior, sensation, and function is very close to the area of the brain that controls the feet.

Neurological overlap you fucking freak.

>>7313942
>implying
None of that is accurate.

"Suppressed" in no manner implies conscious suppression. I can't speak for all cases, but I was attracted to girls from an incredibly early age -- like before K school. Of the same ages, relatively, as well: in one instance, at home listening on a children's tape of a singing solo at the most beautiful singing voice, and what could happen if we would be meeting. And another case, before I could read (around entering K), helping a girl out behind a restaurant carry some milk -- quite a bit of age up, but even those same features are still attractive: skin texture, complexion, etc (similar with the blonde, young actress, "well, yeah" gif).

There are more reasons for fetishes than genes, including interpretation of the same volatile and non-volatile scents, in accordance with surroundings and summaries. Even foot fetishes are possibly correlated with how feet and genital signals enter the spinal cord at the same time; and that their sensory mapping is incredibly close (picture).