/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11656478
>The paper uses different methods to figure out temperature and atmospheric Co2 ppm in different time intervals. Because before approximately 1850 there hasn’t been any real time measurement to speak off. So it’s extrapolation from other measurements. In other words indirect.
None of this implies it's inaccurate.

>And that’s not taking into account our measuring ability was rather terrible even 50 years ago.
Wrong, pic related.

>I criticized the OP for not providing any link to the paper and for misrepresentation of the quality of the study. And provided specific critics of the methodology.
You didn't actually show anything about the study.

>You on the other hand just claim your opponent is dumb.
No I didn't.

>>11652314