/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15754462
>Name: bodhi
>Comment: Anyone who does it for free has to be a sad and lowly sack of shit

if quantum entangled particles collapse instantaneously in a non-local way why is everyone saying you can't use them for FTL communication?
Couldn't you just create two collections of particles (entangled) and use that for the clock (whenever one of the clock particles collapses, that's a tick) and then create another two collections of particles (also entangled) to act as the parity of the information stream?
For example if a tick on the clock corresponds to no collapse fill that position in your interpretation of the stream with the last known value (assuming we start with 0, that would be s[x] = 0, where x is your position in the stream (which happens to also be the total ticks so far))
However for a tick that contains a collapse on the parity set and your last known value is 0, flip the 'last known value' to 1 and fill the next position in the interpretation of the stream to s[x] = 1
and likewise if the last known value is 1, just flip it to 0

Wouldn't that give you FTL binary communication? also please be patient I'm aware I'm retarded and I don't understand QM I'm just trying to figure out why it can't work.

>>15587632
why would you want to abort?
>implying it is crewed