/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12453629
go ahead and hit me with that stats science chief


whats objective is the trending behavior of our reality relative to perception
it first takes a perceiver to make a comment
so i'm supposed to believe that we're all perceiving fundamentally completely the same?
sure there is large commonality in many areas, but a lot of "objective science" is so because the perceivers have been conditioned similarly while using the same language to understand and express

objective science is more like a set of conditioning and perception thats had a lot of energy and resources applied to it
if you gave humans one extra sensory perception, the entirety of science would change

the hub science is building isn't wrong, but it's more like "scienceTM". it's its own brand of understanding and expressing reality.
it has its own understandings and its own borders
the more that one accepts and conditions within whats established, the more one houses within those borders

its a shame theres so much elitism in the sciences. it stifles genuine empty enquiry.

the stats on this thing are going to be bullshit for so long too

what does chronic stress do to the immune system?
what does a lack of exposure to the general bacteria of others do to the immune system?
what does a sedentary lifestyle do to the immune system?

there's so many more, and all these ill-health effects that came specifically from the response are all going to get documented as covid effects.

>>12307244
The fuck kind of comment is that
You can put any outcome into either of those distinctions
Ambiguous words can house any projections

Fuck statisticians

>>12260173
this is why stats is a trash science, especially in objective realms

here is the summary of statistics

>>12249623
a lot of stats is pseud
too much personal bias and too many variables to account for. the walls of the methods and the variables considered always fall short of the totality of whats at play

but the nice comfy number sure embeds itself in peoples heads well. the belief sure carries forward

Stats is a field that is tethered too tight to personal bias and projection to really ever take as concrete as we do
And yet we do, because as soon as we hear those numbers, the organizational brain enjoys the neatness and ease of it

Stat usually isn't worth the paper it's written on. There's wayyyyy too many variables, way too much personal, way too much we don't know and can't account for, etc. Yet we will undergo autistic hypnosis to convince ourselves to take a certain direction.