/sci/ - Science & Math

Kind of like how Hairer just won $3M for calling the MCM unit cell a "regularity structure." When Hairer's coworker said, "Aliens must have done this work," it was a jab at Hairer's obvious failure to acknowledge or cite me.

Hairer's $3M regularity structure is just the MCM.

Hairer's regularity structure is just the MCM unit cell dressed in jargon whose ridiculousness I have not yet assessed. When his coworker was saying that the work must have been done been aliens, the coworker was jibing him for obviously stealing my idea without a ten word acknowledgement at the end which is all ethics call for.

Hairer just won $3M for stealing my idea as well.

Hairer just won $3M for calling my idea a regularity structure.

Hairer stole my idea. The reason his colleague said, "This work must have been done by aliens," was because his colleague had seen my work and it was obvious Hairer stole it, which is to say that he used it without proper attribution, which is unethical. Strangely, the colleague calls me an alien and is on board with the 100% unanimous global conspiracy for no one to ever cite me by name.

It is so curious to me how there are ZERO dissenters among this world-spanning conspiracy wherein everyone unanimously agrees not to praise my name. If it was natural to hate me, you'd think there would be some dissenters. As it is, there are ZERO dissenters in the entire world, a most curious circumstance. Probably I will call everyone in that unanimous consensus.

Hairer just won $3M for stealing the MCM unit cell and calling it a regularity structure.

Mathematician Snags Richest Prize for His 'Alien' Equations
https://www.newser.com/story/296076/mathematician-snags-richest-prize-for-his-alien-equations.html
>A researcher once said that a theory related to a branch of math dealing with random processes was so impressive, it must have come from aliens.
It came from me and the colleague to whom it was obvious that Hairer had stolen my work was calling him out without breaking the unanimous global blackball against every citing me.

It's not that Perelman didn't want the Prize, it's that he was protesting against Hamilton being excluded from the prize. It's like if Hairer turned down the $3M for stealing the MCM unit cell from me in protest of me not receiving the prize with him. It's a lot different than that too because Perelman actually carried Hamilton's work forward and made his own original contributions while Hairer has only pointless dressed my idea in jargon, advancing it not at all, but calling it a "regularity structure" instead of a cosmological unit cell.

Hairer is a real mathematician. He just won $3M for calling the MCM unit cell a regularity structure.

Time cube: what Hairer just won $3M for calling a regularity structure.

What Hairer just won $3M for calling a regularity structure.

When Hairer stole it, what he just won $3M for, he called it a "regularity structure."

Hairer just won $3M for calling it "a regularity structure."

>>12137175
>a fractal cosmological lattice
...which Hairer calls a regularity structure.