/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3495769
>>3495774
and now you're throwing a tantrum. and ignoring the request i made that you explain yourself with your own
>Ad Hominem as it assumes intellectual inferiority
'public/private sector perspective'... you realize that includes EVERYTHING, right? that those are two general labels whose PURPOSE is to, together, include all economic activity? And that I still must insist it is not related at all, because this is not an economic debate, it is a moral one.

>You dislike everything I stand for
only the bit about using people for forced medical experiments likely to amount to murder. as that is all of yourself you have presented here.

>Now I see why it was so hard for you to understand my sentence, you were happy to dismiss it.
No, I did NOT dismiss it. I attempted to parse it even though it was a grammatical clusterfuck, and responded to what I assumed to be the general argument. Which you have completely ignored.

>I didn't mean to refer to psychopathy as a rule, rather, the aspects of it that are socially destructive
>not psychopaths, anyone destructive to or incapable of being integrated to the collective
>YFW

How about meth?

Reporting in.

Would /sci/ conduct crimes against humanity for the sake of science?