[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15910196 [View]
File: 727 KB, 1286x1362, 1635270543159.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15910196

>>15907964
It's not innate. It's learned. And it's called discipline.

>> No.15422398 [View]
File: 727 KB, 1286x1362, 1642825906208.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15422398

>I will ask why do you people think there is so many Black criminality in america specifically.

The answer is artificial criminality.

Why would they release those who have committed crimes, placed into a prison system to interact with other hardened criminals and then back into the same neighborhoods where non-criminals and particularly children reside? What do they think the expected results would be afterwards?

Why would they promote the long-term support of single motherhood to any degree knowing that mothers cannot properly regulate the behavior of growing male and female children past the age of 10yrs? What do they think the expected the results would be afterwards?

Why would they allow higher rates of unemployment than other populations knowing it can create conditions of animosity and bad behavior? What do they think the expected the results would be afterwards?

Even if we assume the worse case scenario that this population is genetically more inclined for criminal behavior for whatever reason. The above actions do not make any lick of sense in any regard UNLESS THEY specifically WANT TO create an artificially higher propensity for criminal behavior in a population already vulnerable to it.

Would YOU release criminals back into vulnerable neighborhoods with impressionable kids? Would YOU promote mothers with children to raise said children by themselves long-term? Would YOU allow a population to have a high unemployment? Would YOU expect a different set of results then what we are getting right now?

I know if it was me who ran a country the last thing I would do or allow to any population in it would be the above actions. Unless again I had in interest in artificially increasing it.

>> No.15417359 [View]
File: 727 KB, 1286x1362, 1642825906208.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15417359

>>15416909
$300k isn't bonkers actually if you think about it. When most people see that number they aren't taking into account how much child care costs are being subsidize by babyshowers, birthdays, holidays, hand me downs, babysitting, cookouts, parties, sleep overs or school food programs. Without family, friends or the state helping frequently to subsidize the cost of living that $300k number is way more likely to occur.

Your child will need new clothes either every year or every other year until they reach their late teens. No help from family or friends balloons this cost unless your spouse is a fucking professional seamstress.

Your child needs to eat two to three times a day. No help from family, friends or the state balloons this cost unless you're a professional farmer who actually has fucking acres of land to farm on.

Your child needs to go to school five times a week for 12 years. If you don't live within suitable walking distance transportation is necessary for the child. If you don't have a good bus program then you're spending gas each day taking your kid to school and picking them up. Or you're giving your kid bus fare to go back and forth to school.

Your child needs to have and practice good hygiene. So they will using toiletries everyday and washing up/ bathing everyday (or everyday other day for some families). Doing this for 17 years straight.

This is without even talking about healthcare. If any mention of frequent or even semi-frequent medical bills come into the picture the argument over $300k is automatically non-disputable.

>> No.14836062 [View]
File: 727 KB, 1286x1362, 1642825906208.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14836062

>>14828855
>Art Majors of every branch have superior intellect than trained k-12 educators, social workers and administrators

Fucking how? How are a bunch of dance autists, drawfags and introverted art restorationists able to intellectually clown on people who are supposed to teach kids how to function in society?

>> No.14824649 [View]
File: 727 KB, 1286x1362, 1635270543159.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14824649

>>14824438
So if we're making more stuff... and we aren't getting paid more... and the government isn't providing more services... where does the money go?

>> No.14616740 [View]
File: 727 KB, 1286x1362, 1635270543159.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14616740

>"The liberals made my life miserable for 43 years," a former clerk remembered Thomas – who was 43 years old when confirmed – saying, according to The New York Times. "And I'm going to make their lives miserable for 43 years."
the levels of seethe are unprecedented

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]