/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6837605

I acknowledge that NASA JPL Scientist Josh Willis said these findings do not throw suspicion on climate change itself. I also acknowledge that NASA gets very large amounts of money for Climate Change work and Josh Willis might lose his job if he were to question climate change.

You, on the other hand, have refused to acknowledge the missing heat which shows that your view of Climate Change has a quasi-religious fanaticism. It is certainly not scientific, as even NASA acknowledges that there is missing heat yet you still can't acknowledge it. That is pretty much the definition of dogma.

>>6791187
Pathetic ad hominem response to protect your religious cult.