/sci/ - Science & Math

Bit late to the thread, but why is tranny discourse so seemingly 'personal' and uniform? With virtually no clinical interest or discussion on the topic from either sides beyond their respective conformist stance? It's either steel manning: Trans-Rights or 42% with nothing in between and zero clinical interest in changing that. And AGGRESSIVE, PEER PRESSURED, "zero interest" at that.
I'm tempted to say that if I somehow miraculously made a medication that completely cured people of gender/sexual dysphoria that both of these communities would picket me. That the conflict is just infinitely more important than the actual condition.

This thread is on /sci/, but I don't see how it'd realistically be any different than if it were on any other board.
I don't understand what memetic aspect of gender dysphoria, as a mental illness, causes literally everyone involved to go insane.

>>15646686
>If windmills are good for the environment, why do they kill so many birds?

The same wind currents/channels that are used by birds, insects, and aeroplankton for travel are also the most effective places to install windmills. You're essentially placing a very large blender on the end of a highway and then whoever can't swerve out of the way fast enough gets shredded. Windmills are better than they used to be, but when they were 'worse as they could be' they had to be constantly washed and maintained due to collecting layers of bug and aeroplankton splatter.

With that said:
-Outdoor cats kill more birds than windmills (though, not equally among all biomes. Most continental ecosystems can handle cats since they're already used to things like snakes, weasels, etc.. And feral cats often get eaten by coyotes, bears, or wolves. It's cats on islands you have to manage.)
-Air pollution kills infinitely more birds than windmills.
Also a little bit of this: >>15646832

>>15646837
>that includes solar panels that cover large amount of lands

They've 'almost' resolved this issue, but your sentiment is valid.
For context often the issue with most 'renewable' sources of energy is:
-They're either geographically determinate. In the regard that they require specific ideal conditions to actually be an 'ideal' competitive alternative; think like geothermal.
-Most renewable energy sources have some kind of discrete hidden cost due to development that stifles their availability regardless. Wind Mills kill birds, make a noise we can hear that makes fucks with our inner ear, and the blades can't be recycled. Solar panels require exotic expensive materials/components and also used to really cool the shit out of wherever you placed them.