/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11653265
>1/10th of 1 degree
Source: your ass

>>11601004
>no it doesn't
It does. Why are you lying about anyone can easily look up and that you can even see in your own graph?

CO2 10000 years ago: 265 ppm
CO2 200 years ago: 285 ppm
CO2 100 years ago: 300 ppm
CO2 today: 415 ppm

>there is no warming trend
Wrong. Pic related. Why are you lying about anyone can easily look up and that you can even see in your own graph?

>I know
Then why are you saying high CO2 concentrations correlate with the beginning of cooling when you know what actually correlates with the beginning of cooling?

>no evidence of this.
It's directly observed: http://asl.umbc.edu/pub/chepplew/journals/nature14240_v519_Feldman_CO2.pdf and has been scientific fact since the 1800s. Why are you lying about such a basic fact?

>if you'd been educated you might be aware of pic related and absurdity of the idea of believing concentration of one gas is the earths temperature dial.
Who said it is?

>Anthropogenic Climate change is preposterous
Then why are you completely incapable of making an honest critique of it?