[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.2077519 [View]
File: 66 KB, 620x413, 1279759355014.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2077519

>>2077489

Good you should say that. Pic related: the people who study climate science have a higher acceptance rate.

>> No.1670790 [View]
File: 66 KB, 620x413, 1279759355014.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1670790

(A separate study, link in the image)

Support for human-made climate change rises sharply with expertise in the area. The study also found that a correlation between support of climate change and number of publications accepted. (As support drops, so does publications).

>> No.1667246 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 66 KB, 620x413, 1279759355014.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1667246

>> No.1456273 [View]
File: 66 KB, 620x413, consensus poll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1456273

>>1456233

Thanks. This image is from Doran & Zimmerman 2009.

Also, a recent study from Anderegg, Prall, Harold and Schneider (RIP) reveals how the less prominent of a scientist you are, the more likely you become a "skeptic."

http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract

Jim Prall has an interesting website, you can put your mouse over the dots and see which scientist had how many papers published and citations.

http://www.eecg.utoronto.ca/~prall/climate/index.html

I wonder where the WUWT guy went?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]