/sci/ - Science & Math

>>14696528
Being a worthless sexhaver is still better than being a worthless virgin though

>work on Webb
>Regularly browse /sci/
The feds are gonna investigate me aren't they

>>14493045
>>14493046
>>14493049
>>14493053
>>14493056
>>14493079
Just realized I fucked up the last part:

>Cowan draws the following analogy: “A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.”1359

>Consequently, it cannot be concluded that the RNA gene sequences “pulled” from the tissue samples prepared in these studies and “calibrated” to the PCR tests belong to a very specific virus, in this case SARS-CoV-2. Especially since the electron microscope images, which are supposed to represent SARS-CoV-2, actually show particles that vary greatly in size. In one paper, the particles range from 60 nm to 140 nm. A specific virus that has such extreme size variation cannot exist by definition.