/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3899446
>An alternative explanation is that something has always been there.

Except that's not an explanation, you've just pointed to something else that requires more explaining.

>And I'm not even convinced that covers all possible explanations.

Can you provide any such alternate explanation(s)?

>>3529848
>Meats are an important source of protein, amino-acids and other important vitamins and minerals.

>implying you can't get those things elsewhere

>>3482425
>if you take gos as dude sitting on cloud who created this planet 6500 years ago and populated it with two modern humans then this God soesn't exists, sorry.

Oh, but thats' not what i mean by god at all. Belief in god just means the thing that caused the universe was intelligent. That's the only property I need to satisfy in order for creationism to be correct. And so what makes you think that you can subjectively say what is valid evidence for or against this claim? Why are scientific theories (i.e not facts) about the origin of the universe more probable than theories about intelligent design?

In order to be against creationism, you would have to prove that the thing that caused caused the universe was most likely *not* to be intelligent, by means of asserting a more likely cause for the universe.

How can you assert a more likely cause than intelligent design if you can't prove any alternative causes? The answer is you can't, so there is no reason to deny intelligent design as being just as likely as a naturalistic explanation.

>>3432444
And there you go: >>3432452

So then , it's confirmed that we live in a zero energy virtual universe that came about out of uncertainty and relativity.

This means the meaning of life is that it happens because it can.

>We still haven't figured out why there is something rather than nothing

Because nothing is a relative quantity and requires definition via opposites annihilating.

OP needs to think about the very real possibility that humans will become masters of the universe(s).

What is /sci/'s opinion on the ethics of unearned income?

welfare, share dividends/capital gains, bank interest, all that.

Sciency cat names. Preferably related to genetics or chemistry, but anything is acceptable as long as it makes for a good name, and can easily be made into a good-sounding nickname.

Right now, all I really have thought of is Iso.