/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11167901

show me the studies then lol. and no, we are herbivores (or frugivores depending how technical you wanna be). read through the study i linked, humans have nothing in common with carnivores and omnivores. you've got to be a complete retard to think we are natural meat eaters.

>>11167898

blah blah more anecdotal evidence or made up BS. post an actual study you /pol/cuck. i noticed you completely ignored all the links/studies i posted earlier.

>>11135527

because humans are objectively herbivores lmao

>>11050862

indeed we're not. we're frugivores who became starchivores in the Paleolithic era.

>>11001673
>>11001676
>>11000711

just accept it, you meat eating carnist cucks, you're on the wrong side of history and you are basically science denying flat earther equivalents at this point.

sources:

http://www.grist.org/factory-farms/2011-03-03-time-to-end-insane-practice-of-lacing-chicken-feed-with-arsenic

http://pcrm.org/search/?cid=2087

http://www.peta.org/living/vegetarian-living/top-10-reasons-not-to-eat-chickens.aspx

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/consumer-reports-chicken-salmonella-campylobacter-bacteria/story?id=9210116

http://thefoodwatchdog.com/04/public-health/pathogens/studies-find-resistant-bacteria-in-meat/

Debate rebuttals:

http://www.godfist.com/vegansidekick/guide.php

https://freefromharm.org/eating-animals-addressing-our-most-common-justifications/