[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.2139195 [View]
File: 64 KB, 346x349, FuturamaNixon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2139195

>>2138820
No, an ecliptic is the path we perceive the sun to travel through the sky. That all the planets orbit around the sun almost on a plane is the consequence of the solar system being formed vis a vis an accretion disc.

>> No.1755046 [View]
File: 64 KB, 346x349, FuturamaNixon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1755046

Hey /sci/, I'm doing a short speech about the day that the LHC collided protons at 7 TeV for a college-level speech class. I don't want to get technical at all (I'm no particle physicist anyway). I just need a good, accurate comparison of the amount of energy it takes to get these protons moving at 7 TeV. Something like "Imagine taking a grain of sand and pumping enough energy in it to power Los Angeles for a day." or something to that effect. Is this a valid comparison?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]