[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:

View post   
>> No.15773644 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories descriptions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15773644

https://nintil.com/consciousness-and-its-discontents

>What theories do I think are probably true, with probabilities, as of today:

>1. Neutral monism/Panpsychism(60%)
>2. Interactionist dualism(30%)
>3. Epiphenomenalism(10%)
>4. Idealism(~epsilon%)
>5. Non-interactionist dualism(~epsilon%)
>6. Identity theory(~0% as it rejects consciousness as real)
>7. Eliminativism(~0% as it rejects consciousness as real)

>> No.15768456 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories descriptions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15768456

>>15766782
https://nintil.com/consciousness-and-its-discontents

>What theories do I think are probably true, with probabilities, as of today:

>1. Neutral monism/Panpsychism(60%)
>2. Interactionist dualism(30%)
>3. Epiphenomenalism(10%)
>4. Idealism(~epsilon%)
>5. Non-interactionist dualism(~epsilon%)
>6. Identity theory(~0% as it rejects consciousness as real)
>7. Eliminativism(~0% as it rejects consciousness as real)

>> No.15661662 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories descriptions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15661662

>>15658237
Dual-aspect theory maybe?

>> No.15415297 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, 1682648440292898.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15415297

Alright /sci/ bros it's time to take a vote.
What is your personal opinion here?
Also where do you think is the /x/ cutoff?

>> No.15399902 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, 1682598929884364.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15399902

>>15399808
>its more a hybrid
Like what?

>> No.15398353 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, 1676314315210554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15398353

Materialism is wrong, but idealism still does not address the hard problem. It merely flips it around. Under idealism, why should the thing-in-itself that is represented by my brain be self-aware? It is the exact same problem.

>> No.15211473 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories descriptions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15211473

>>15211333
>there are far better options like Idealism on the table
What about Neutral Monism or Interactionist Dualism?

https://nintil.com/consciousness-and-its-discontents

>What theories do I think are probably true, with probabilities, as of today:

>1. Neutral monism/Panpsychism(60%)
>2. Interactionist dualism(30%)
>3. Epiphenomenalism(10%)
>4. Idealism(~epsilon%)
>5. Non-interactionist dualism(~epsilon%)
>6. Identity theory(~0% as it rejects consciousness as real)
>7. Eliminativism(~0% as it rejects consciousness as real)

>> No.15200171 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories descriptions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15200171

>>15196572
Probabilities of different consciousness theories being true:

https://nintil.com/consciousness-and-its-discontents

>What theories do I think are probably true, with probabilities, as of today:

>1. Neutral monism/Panpsychism(60%)
>2. Interactionist dualism(30%)
>3. Epiphenomenalism(10%)
>4. Idealism(~epsilon%)
>5. Non-interactionist dualism(~epsilon%)
>6. Identity theory(~0% as it rejects consciousness as real)
>7. Eliminativism(~0% as it rejects consciousness as real)

>> No.15161904 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories descriptions.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15161904

>>15161574

>> No.14595002 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14595002

>> No.14577963 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, AI HUMAN consciousness theories artificial intelegance meme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14577963

>>14572891
>excited in getting to watch the ascent
>I do not care about trying to climb higher, myself.
cuck mindset

>> No.14575878 [View]
File: 583 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14575878

>>14575335
Relevant:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlIgmTALU74

>> No.12748259 [View]
File: 584 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12748259

>> No.12324642 [View]
File: 584 KB, 862x2428, consciousness theories.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12324642

>>12321107
>I think his points on empty/open individualism and eternalism to be very interesting.
His arguments for Open/Empty Individualism assumed reductive physicalism, which is philosophically dubious. He later rejected OI in favor of Idealism.

>> No.12056377 [View]
File: 584 KB, 862x2428, theories of consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12056377

>>12056029
https://www.qualiaresearchinstitute.org/

>> No.11979409 [View]
File: 584 KB, 862x2428, theories of consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11979409

>>11977362

>> No.11979345 [View]
File: 584 KB, 862x2428, theories of consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11979345

>>11979156
>>11979225
>being a reductive ph*sicalist

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]