/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12477475
>forbes as a source, and not a scientific paper
>person is only saying some of what the universe is made of is points, so they're not even making your point
>implying quantum physics has a consensus
>thinking quarks, gluons, electrons are the fundamental lowest level of existence

Just answer the question about the double slit experiment. It's very clearly implies at the very least particle wave duality, if not a straight up wave universe.

>order triple cheeseburger ketchup only at mcdonalds
>unwrap burger later at home
>only two patties

Bros on my life I'm gonna go back and yell real loud at the employees

>they still trust mint afrer that download page snafu

Why is orgasm a moment of perfect clarity for guys?

>>8965580

>>8825279
Good luck finding a non-government organized think tank to work in.

Unless that is your thing, in which case, it's going to get cut so the justice dept. can run with the results from their internal investigations.

>>8752067
And math & music are same

>>8752080
I think the truer "definition" of math extends beyond our concept of numbers themselves obviously as they are a way we can interpret/understand it. Basically saying consciousness is a result of "numbers" would assume numbers as the universal constant while another species' system of arrangement may be different. The inherent harmony and order of "math" is what generates consciousness

I think once you start looking at music/ math as flip natures of the same coin we begin to broaden our perspective of what either really means

Why is it such a certainty that dark matter exists as a halo around galaxies?
With current technology, we need something to be shining with the brightness of a billion suns just to notice it in orbit around our own galaxy; a huge cloud around our galaxy with few stars could easily be missed, let alone the same around other galaxies.

>>8536317

> it is now deemed unlikely that any region within the observable universe is dominated by antimatter.

In the picture i drew the observable universe as a small circle in a huge cloud of regular matter, thats what i'm saying, the regions dominated by antimmater could just be incredibly far away beyond our observable universe
>>8536580

> the only thing is that the universe became less dense and and cooler

It was the densest and the hottest thing possible in this reality since it was ALL matter moving very fast in very little space, saying that a sudden stretch of space wouldn't effect the distribution is retarded since before the stretch happened it was too hot to form anything. If thats the way you picture the primordial soup you are mistaken

>>8380772
>replace y(-1) with ln(-1) + C
>ln(-1)