/sci/ - Science & Math

Anonymous Mon Aug 15 22:53:28 2022 No.14761638 [View]
File: 46 KB, 870x292, 1644949903914.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>14761625
He says he's not saying this was for-sure a factor, but that the test for roundness NASA was using at the time could not have caught this sort of out-of-roundness, and that NASA subsequently changed their procedures for measuring roundness.

But I've never heard of this, and this guy kind of comes across as a doofus so I'm skeptical of it. Does anybody know if NASA changed the way they measure roundness, particularly w.r.t. the SRBs, in response to the Challenger disaster?

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

Navigation
View posts	[+24]	[+48]	[+96]

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search: