/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11818213
>How would carbon taxes not solve anything? You're just against taxes so you deny they can ever solve anything.
Have they helped to solve this problem at all?
>So scientific facts are unfair because they "force" people to take a position?
Good luck getting your research funded when it goes against public consensus
>What the fuck? Ice is at the poles regardless of whether we are in a glacial period or interglacial period. What is a "geological reference?"
See picture plus there is evidence that the poles had not icecaps in the Jurassic and Cretaceous
>What do you mean?
>Letting global warming occur unmitigated will be worse.
So, global warming is much worse but where's the preparation for the inevitable?
>How are these coincidences?
The cycles coincide with the Vostok Ice core temperature rise, are you going to tell me you haven't seen that graph?
>LOL, you mean developing countries develop? Just ignore Western nations did the same thing. What a pathetic excuse.
I'm not excusing anyone, faggot, the Western nations developed like that because nobody cared about the environment until around 1950. Now we have the data and the developing nations ignore it after various treaties and agreements to try and diminish emissions
>Like who?
Google "global warming" and tell me you don't find news or research that warns will fuck up Earth so badly it will be no different from a mass extinction.