/sci/ - Science & Math

Is the function [math]e^{1.01x}[/math] exponentially larger than [math]e^{x}[/math]?

>majority of black and hispanic voters vote democrat
>democrat avarge iq is lower than republican
HMMMMMMMM

>>11525927
Well. Idk if u kno this but ∞ isn't a number.
It's only defined usage in the axiom of infinity is attributing a size to the set of all numbers.
thing was, N was my set of all numbers, so it's size was ∞. Bijected with S, gives me a 0.9 sequence with ∞ size as well.

i guess you can say the size of S is unrelated to the length of the 0.9 sequences, but then how do you even define a length of an element with ∞ when ∞ is a notion of sets and you can't create sets like [math]N^9: [0,9,9,9,9,\dots][/math] mappable to the n'th decimal of set N whose size is infinite, because N9 contains repeated elements which (i'm pretty sure) aren't allowed?

>>10459333
>(large long noses)
hmmm...

cant we teach neural networks to make better neural networks ?

>>9936679
>there is nothing left to do
>the act of doing nothing has yet to be done
>"doing nothing" validates as an act, and therefore doing something
>there is never nothing left to do, cause everything can't be done if it includes "doing nothing"
>theres always at least something left to do, even if its nothing
>doing nothing is doing something
>can't actually "do" nothing though

>euler rotations uselesd cause gimbal lock
>quaternions useless without being converted to euler
>conversion still gimbal locks cause its euler

>>9739542
>0.98999... = 0.99
Hm...

0.21999... = 0.22
0.22219... = 0.2222
0.222...1999... = 0.222...

[ ... 2 2 2 1 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 ... ] =
[ ... 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ... ]

>>9734019
So your logical fallacy belief that 1/3 = 0.333... relies on the fact you believe infinity is a real number that can be incremented to?

Really makes ya think.

Feel free to entertain what a value [math]\frac{n}{\infty}[/math] might be, but you're more than just a little 'tarded if you think you can increment to an infinite'th step in infinite work.

> tfw go to brainlet directional university
> set the curve on basically every exam I have ever taken

not sure how to feel tbqh, its nice not having to work too hard but everyone else around me really should not even be in college.

the worst thing is how shitty the professors are though, whenever I ask them a difficult question they usually just sutter and sift though their notes.

had one genius tier indian guy who taught my physics class though

>>9576403
>you're wrong but i can't prove it

>>9567765
( P -> Q ) is equivalent to ( !P v Q )
(You can get the CNF from the truth table if you're not sure about it.)

Therefore the opposite of P -> Q:
!( P -> Q ) is equivalent to !( !P v Q )
which is equivalent to (P ^ !Q) according to DeMorgan's law.

TL;DR
(P ^ !Q)

>>9540543
Infinity is not a number. Let me fix your post [math]senpai[/math]

>you'll never get to a lot just by adding repetitions one at a time, to get to a lot you have to add a lot of repetitions
see how it works? i'm retarded

>>9488903
Is infinity even or odd?
If infinity were a number, it ought to be even or odd!

Is infinity a prime? Is it complex or an integer?

Is infinity divisable into a smaller number? All real numbers are divisable!

Hmm...

>>9391673
How is someone supposed to say those numbers? Do they have names?

>>9382084
If monkies are descended from fish then why are there still fish. If fish are descended from trilobytes then why are there still trilobytes. If dinosaurs were a bajillion years ago then why were a couple mentioned in the bible. If the jews didn't do 9/11 then why did a jew own the twin towers and get catastrophic insurance on them a few months earlier, then ask for a double payout cause it was 2 plane attacks, all the while WTC7 was already rigged to be demolished from the inside?
If the jews are god's chosen people then why did they kill Jesus? If the holocaust happened then why has it taken the jewish population 75 years to get back to pre-war census when it had only taken them 20 years to get to that same number before? If the holocaust was meant to genocide the jews then why were they kept alive in camps while "death squads" of executioners also existed? If the holocaust was so effective then why were there holocaust survivors?

>>9332849
>Survival based on a healthy tribe that can divvy up labour
>Fags are huge disease carriers and a genetic dead end that will just eat up resources
>No evolutionary advantage to not wanting them around

>>9331183
> 1 / ∞ = 0
Oh i see where you were confused. See your problem was that you were just retarded the whole time.
1 / ∞ = ω

0.999[...] + ω = 1.0

Has anyone actually done any research on this? Why is this not a hot topic?

Just from observation I would say that the ability to work hard is all about focus and endurance. People who work hard can focus on one task without getting distracted.

For example a lazy person might force themselves to do their math homework but will constantly think about checking social media or playing video games. To fight these distractions the person will have to use mental energy and will get tired quicker.

Meanwhile a hard working person won't even have any thoughts about doing anything else but the task.

Then I also think that some people have a lower pain/discomfort tolerance. For someone the discomfort of studying is bearable compared to the payoffs. For someone else studying is so painful that they avoid it at all costs until the deadline gets close.

Some people I imagine get tired more quickly.

By hard work I am excluding activities where the person enjoys them like if studying mathematics is actually your passion. I am talking here about people who are able to bring themselves to work even though they don't enjoy the work.

Would be nice if someone would actually research this.

>>9177870
>gives no definition or measurement of capability or potential
>gives no example of any historical negro population with exceptional cognitive ability, despite negros populating 3 continents for 4 hundred years