/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15412926
>∗Equal contribution. Listing order is random.
Nice try pooskin. That's an AMERICAN company with mostly White authors. It's also not even close to the most prolific, the paper by Hinton is:

"Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks" (2017), 131 700 citations

You're just cherrypicking due to your Jew-like pooskin behaviour. Anyway go here, disillusion your racist propoganda myth brain, these are the real leaders of AI, almost entirely White:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=search_authors&hl=en&mauthors=label:machine_learning

>>15412930
Yeah and? He's European and did his degrees in Germany also for that work. He's doing post-docs in foreign countries which is usual and expected. I know this is difficult for an identity crisis, nationalist, money chasing sellout duch as yourself to understand.


You are very desperately grasping for straws here. Pooskin innovation is at a rate 18 times less than Whites, as it always has been and always will be.

Should America open their borders to Africa? They just want a better life after all. Plus all humans are the same, science proved that it's purely socioeconomic factors that cause a disparity in success. Imagine if the US had 1 billion people, they would be unstoppable.

>>15382344
>le strings of code fed data to draw conclusions, where AI will surely "win" means all humans will be made redundant
Holy cope. It's just big data being fed into a model so that model predictions fit the data. We would need to completely change the current way we think about AI for it to actually resemble human intelligence.
Some ethnicities excel in exams and memorisation but what have they actually accomplished? Not a lot really.