Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

If you can see this message, the SSL certificate expiration has been fixed.
Become a Patron!

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.9715503 [View]
File: 5 KB, 497x111, 1200px-Aleph0.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9715503

Reminder that we don't know, and can't know, what the cardinality of so-called real numbers is, and saying that cardinality of R is continuum, which is defined as a cardinality of R, is just saying "the answer is whatever the answer is", so it isn't saying anything and is not proper maths.
How can you tell R is a valid mathematical object if it doesn't even have well-defined cardinality?



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]