/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10096867
>You're actually retarded if you believe this
Not An Argument (TM)

hey, I think antibiotics might cause heart attacks in tuberculosis patients. the ONLY WAY to be ABSOLUTELY SURE they're safe is to randomly give a bunch of them placebos instead of antibiotics, and not tell them which they have!

>Even doctors are aware that vaccines are trash.
~15% of doctors also smoke cigarettes. does that mean tobacco is safe?
(oh wait, you probably think it is because you're a delusional retard. crank attraction and all that.)

>>9858776
>t. guy who knows nothing about petroleum engineering but read a few articles in Popular Mechanics once

>mfw the stormfags and flatheads start arguing over whether """"race realism"""" and flat-earth """"science"""" are comparable

>>9737589
>Watson, Nobel Prize recipient and distinguished genetic researcher, says race and intelligence and race are related.
how is this different from Lorentz Medal winner and distinguished physicist Freeman Dyson saying global warming is fake? credentials don't magically make your opinion right; even if you're a celebrated researcher, you have to provide evidence to back up your claims.

>>9221199
>allopatric speciation as a method of filling a "niche"
except that allopatric speciation is not a method of filling a niche. it's when you say shit like this that people realize how ignorant you are.
and are you really going all proofster on me? you want me to show you a citation to prove something that follows directly from the definitions of the terms we're using?

nice pic by the way, but you forgot about one thing.
>not pictured: the innumerable mllions of individuals between Samotherium and modern Giraffa that, due to their shorter necks, were at a foraging disadvantage in dry open savanna habitats and died without offspring, causing that trait to gradually go to extinction in the population.
you know, the ones that you seem to think turned into other things rather than dying out.

>major conservative party/movement adopts explicitly anti-scientific views such as climate change denial, support for creationism, effective bans on gun violence research, and defunding of open-ended research
>suddenly academics aren't interested in the conservative platform anymore
>conservatives demand political affirmative action in academia
>mfw

>>9186873
>muh UHI
>not reading Hausfather et al. 2013
pleb
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2012JD018509/full

>>9176807
>CO2 will magically reduce plants' dependence on iron, phosphate, and nitrate!
>I don't know how, but I'm sure it will happen just like those nice men at the Heritage Foundation said it will
so much for "Deal with facts not predictions"

>you can’t just say x is the limiting factor.
that's where you're wrong, kiddo.