/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10701183
The atmosphere is made up of 0.04% carbon dioxide. Humans contribute as much as 2-4% of that 0.04%. If you blame that on whatever you study, you then no longer need to work out the actual reason and can simply go cash your check. This post was due to climate change.

>>9319753
>Richard_Garwin
>You have to be pretty smart to be an evil piece of shit that created the greatest weapon of mass destruction known to mankind.

Why is this guy glorified once again?

>tfw intelligent but not brilliant (sub-140 IQ)
>tfw extremely disciplined and hardworking
>tfw I can achieve things at the level of Einstein, von Neumann, GauB, etc if I keep on working hard and get a little lucky

Good to be disciplined bros

>>8637640
Your main problem is you feel the need to raise the alarm, sound the bell, scare the shit out of everyone. I've seen the trends, they're barely there, I consider myself not scared on solid ground, and it's not because i'm being paid by big oil. Why don't you try not embellishing, say something we can agree on like "hey's there's an anomalous bump in the temp, it's only 0.5C over the last century and a half, it could be something or it could be nothing." We'd agree - if you tried that, but instead you magnify reality and embellish like an overly dramatic grandmother. Leading to an entire thread of you getting btfo by your own data and bias measurement techniques and interpretations.

so let's just not, here's to wishing for the mods to quickly delete this cancer of a thread.

>>8386402
It wouldn't be able to transmit anything and just flow around doing nothing for the sake of the feeling