/sci/ - Science & Math

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fkpddj-FdFw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72DA4fgamPE

http://walkingdroplet.com/

Moláček, J., & Bush, J. W. (2013). Drops walking on a vibrating bath: towards a hydrodynamic pilot-wave theory. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 727, 582-617.
http://math.mit.edu/~bush/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/MB2-2013.pdf

Could it be Robert Brady, an industrial research fellow from Cambridge University, made one of the most important developments in physics of the last 100 years?
Give me your best arguments pro and con.
Analise the rigor of the mathematics and the derivations. Give me your precious notes about it. Thanks.
Don't be a dick just because it is against the Copenhagen Interpretation. Or because your favorite idolized physicist didn't come up with it first.

http://classicalfluidparticlephysics.tumblr.com/post/50079617935/fluid-dynamics-mechanics

Summary:
>The sonon is a self-perpetuating flow state of an inviscid compressible fluid. Sonons attract and repel each other, just like charged particles. And they radiate mathematically equivalent to Electromagnetism Theory.
>* They follow Lorentz covariance, hence Relativity
>* They are non dissipative and self-perpetuating wave structures. They explaon Yves Couder's walking-droplets, macroscopic Particle-Wave duality. Therefore they behave as quantum particles.
>* The quasi-particle is attracted by large masses of fluid, there is a gravitational field.

The author is not making the leap. That is so people judge it strictly based on mathematical and predictive properties. Not on its potential questioning of the academia philosophical status-quo, the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Nor he wants to hear that there is no Fluid Dynamics support to either Relativity or Quantum Mechanics. On his live presentation, scientists that made the leap also turned very skeptical, because current academia teaches it already surpassed any approach to find such broad reaching concepts in Classical Physics.
Brady avoids the leap and talks about it being an analogy, so the theory doesn't get crushed before he finishes developing the model to all its potential.