[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15989669 [View]
File: 80 KB, 850x400, quote-a-scientific-truth-does-not-triumph-by-convincing-its-opponents-and-making-them-see-max-planck-23-29-19-3234714255.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15989669

>>15989538
why would we read your unfounded conspiracy theories that haven't played out over the decades?

we're done with your pretend crisis, everyone knows science is wrong and also gay now. get educated, bigot.

>> No.15810938 [View]
File: 80 KB, 850x400, quote-a-scientific-truth-does-not-triumph-by-convincing-its-opponents-and-making-them-see-max-planck-23-29-19-3234714255.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15810938

>>15810578
>Like i said, smarter people are more correct on average than less smart people.
And like I said, that's not true in my experience. What are you basing this off of? And my observation isn't limited to politics and religion, smart people are often committed institutionalists, look how many high IQ people bought into the china virus hysteria and defended the pharmaceutical industry despite its terrible track record of fraud and manipulation.

You're mistaken in believing there's a clear category of knowledge called "facts" that can be objectively determined. Different people, however smart, can have wildly different ideas about what facts and ideas are credible or discredited.

The very arguments you're making are the types of biases that cloud smart people's thinking, if you're a smart person, you're proving my point.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]